I've sunk over 100 hours into Skyrim and I enjoyed it for reasons that were not its story-telling. I can't even name any characters from Skyrim except for Ulfric Stormcloak - and that was because I must have replayed the intro to that game making new characters about a dozen times. That said, I'm sure he recognizes Skyrim is a great game but at the same time he's absolutely right about it being generic. You act like the director ran over your dog or something.
Jesus christ, calm down with all the hostility. I was looking forward to the new Witcher game now I don't know. I was looking forward to the new Witcher game now I don't The Witcher 2 is a much better game than Skyrim, it's not "very cocky" in any regard (though it is an admittedly cheap way to get press) I hope he eats his words when he realizes how hard it is to develop an open world (without making it on rails like the Witcher games). That's because the had to read all the previous books to be able to make the game right. I bet he can name 5 characters from the Witcher. Most people here can probably recite all the continents and even some history of the Elder Scroll games.
The elder scrolls series isn't about characters, but the world. It's easy for that cock mouth to say Skyrim was boring story wise when his is based off someone else's book. That director is up his own ass with those comments. It puts the pressure on them to not fuck it up but they already proved they can produce quality games. It's not being arrogant when they already delivered a better game than Skyrim. The Witcher 2 is a much better game than Skyrim, it's not "very cocky" in any regard (though it is an admittedly cheap way to get press)
0 kommentar(er)
